If you are reading this article, you likely belong to the richest quartile of the country. According to an April 2004 New York Times article, three quarters of Harvard's class of '03 came from the top quartile of the income distribution; only 6.8 percent came from the bottom. The figures for Princeton are similar. If Princeton is truly interested in being "in the nation's service," then not only is it failing its mandate, but it is also exacerbating inequalities. For higher education to be a means of social mobility, the playing field must be made more level for the less affluent. Let's face it: Princeton is a bastion of privilege. The problem faced by elite institutions, then, is how to attract and admit qualified students from more diverse economic backgrounds. Growing up, I belonged to the bottom quartile. Aside from the disadvantages of poverty, my parents also played no role in my schooling, and my teenage years were spent in and out of the courts. I graduated from high school at the age of 20, after dropping out once and being expelled twice. My acceptance into Trinity College (University of Toronto) came as a surprise in spite of my eventual…